News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub... by nodesocket on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:01AM (#16909757)
Should be able to use CloudFlare and "flexible" SSL setup. CNAME at the apex pointing to GitHub pages.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub... by LethargicStud on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:05AM (#16909770)
Please don't do this. It gives the user the illusion that their connection is secure, but the connection between Cloudflare and the site is not secure. Arguably it's better to encrypt some of the route rather than none of it, but also giving people a false sense of security comes with its own drawbacks.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub... by nodesocket on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:09AM (#16909781)
Actually "flexible" might not be needed, "full" without strict should work. Traffic is still over TLS, but a valid named certificate is not required.
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub... by jhasse on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @02:19AM (#16910317)
I think the user mostly cares about his connection to anything outside his network (e.g. for public WiFis).
Re:Jenkins X: a CI/CD solution for cloud applications on Kub... by manigandham on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @12:41AM (#16909884)
You should set it to "Full" instead. That will use TLS but won't verify the domain name in the certificate like it does in "Strict" mode so you can still use Github pages.