News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Executing gradient descent on the earth by Strilanc on Friday April 20, 2018 @05:37AM (#16883429)
The spheres and the cubes are of the same dimension, so it's not like trying to put flat things inside of a thing with volume. (Technically I should have said million dimensional balls instead of spheres. Sorry if that was confusing.)
Re:Executing gradient descent on the earth by sudhirj on Friday April 20, 2018 @09:20AM (#16884491)
Then isn’t the answer 1? For 2 dimensions, one circle fits in a square, in three dimensions one sphere fits in a cube. Should be the same for any value of n?
Re:Executing gradient descent on the earth by Strilanc on Friday April 20, 2018 @12:36PM (#16886257)
Consider that the distance between opposite corners of a square is √2 meters, but for a cube it's √3 meters. In general, for an n-dimensional hypercube of diameter 1m, the exactly-opposite corners are √n meters apart.

Meaning, in a million-dimensional meter-diameter hypercube, exactly-opposite corners will be a kilometer apart. There's a lot more diagonal wiggle room than you think.

Re:Executing gradient descent on the earth by therein on Friday April 20, 2018 @03:07PM (#16887640)
That blew my mind but it still sounds like it would generalize, wouldn't it?