News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Analemma_ on Sunday April 15, 2018 @03:45PM (#16844523)
There wouldn’t be one (and indeed, there isn’t one): ETH is now just a shitty clone of the current fiat banking system, but with even less transparency and more corruption (and to put the cherry on it, it’s an environmental catastrophe to boot). It’ll be a few more years before the starry-eyed libertarians figure that out though.
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Dylan16807 on Sunday April 15, 2018 @04:09PM (#16844660)
You don't see a difference between banks that undo transactions constantly, and a system that might undo one or two a year?
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by beefield on Sunday April 15, 2018 @04:31PM (#16844781)
Disclaimer: I do not recall my bank undoing my transaction. Ever, that is.

But, yes, I assume that banks do undo transactions somewhat regularly. And I do see a difference. With regards to the banks, there are regulatory bodies with necessary tools to oversee banks and force (of course, they do fail occasionally...) them to behave properly. With Ethereum, there is no such body, but I am expected to trust a bunch of people who claim to have developed a currency which requires no trust. The oxymoron in the last sentence is in itself enough for me to prefer banks, thank you very much.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by profalseidol on Sunday April 15, 2018 @06:43PM (#16845427)
> but I am expected to trust a bunch of people who claim to have developed a currency which requires no trust

It does require trust just as you require trust from the seeders/peers of a BitTorrent shared file. If these seeders/peers agree that they should modify the said file, you either agree with them or not. If latter, then you end up with a two versions.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by beefield on Monday April 16, 2018 @02:56AM (#16847151)
I don't recall "trustless" being one of bittorrent's main selling points?

Further, to accept crypto as payment very much requires trust (or faith or belief or whatever you want to call it) that you later find some third party that is willing to accept your coins as payment, preferably with roughly the same value that you assigned to it in the first place.

Awfully lot of trust flying around in a trustless system in my opinion.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by profalseidol on Tuesday April 17, 2018 @07:38PM (#16863308)
You'll have to understand that the trust in 'trustless system' is in the technical sense. Think of traditional RDBMS versus blockchain for sharing data between two companies. The former needs trust because it is mutable and controlled by an admin. The latter is more designed to be 'trustless'.

I hope your technical ability helps me here in conveying my point to you.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by tigershark on Sunday April 15, 2018 @05:00PM (#16844939)
You don’t see a difference between a regulated system in a state were people are sovereign and one system where the people at the top of it can do whatever they want? It’s kind of sad to see a lot of people enjoying fascism barely 70 years after the most terrible war to date...
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Dylan16807 on Sunday April 15, 2018 @08:45PM (#16845920)
> You don’t see a difference

I don't know how to reply to this. That's the opposite of what I said.

> It’s kind of sad to see a lot of people enjoying

I hope you're not talking about me, because I wasn't expressing a preference between entire systems. I was just pointing out a single aspect.

(If you must know, I think having a court system is best, but having the EIP system is better than nothing.)

It's confusing to see my comment go from a positive score to negative while replies show up all agreeing with me...

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by nradov on Sunday April 15, 2018 @06:45PM (#16845437)
Undoing transactions is one of the most useful features of real banks. It helps prevent fraud.
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Sangermaine on Sunday April 15, 2018 @08:55PM (#16845955)
Yeah, people arguing against this are so far removed from what the vast majority of people want that it's not really possible to have a discussion with them.

Most people like that you can have your bank or credit card company hold or reverse a suspicious transaction, and don't regard that as evil statist chains of slavery.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by aianus on Sunday April 15, 2018 @04:18PM (#16844719)
Not just undoing them; if my bank's ML fraud algorithm doesn't like my purchase, it won't let me make it at all! And the customer service rep doesn't know why it's happening and tells me he can't override it and "could I please stop using www.grabtaxi.com"

Happens to me multiple times a year, it's unbelievably bad.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by kalleboo on Monday April 16, 2018 @12:49AM (#16846733)
That sounds unacceptable, why haven't you changed banks?!
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by aianus on Monday April 16, 2018 @04:09PM (#16852254)
I am with a different bank now, but previously the bank above (Chase) was the only bank in Canada that offered foreign transactions without an annual fee or a 2.5% currency conversion fee.
Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Sangermaine on Sunday April 15, 2018 @08:57PM (#16845965)
>You don't see a difference between banks that undo transactions constantly

You should use a different bank if this is actually true. This is not a common experience.

Re:Proposal to restore a destroyed Ethereum contract by Dylan16807 on Sunday April 15, 2018 @09:07PM (#16846011)
Some bounced checks, most fake checks, all chargebacks...

I don't have to experience these personally to know there is a vast landscape of transactions that get unraveled days to months later.

Some of these benefit the consumer, and some hurt the consumer.

But they apply to all banks.