Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by michaelmrose on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:33AM
(#16836193)
Further if Europe can ask for info to be censored what happens when 100 other nations ask the same for their own reasons. Will the search index be composed only of data that is acceptable to all parties?
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by shandor on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:08AM
(#16836433)
When EU dictates what can be in the search index it is "right to be forgotten".
When China or Russia does it, it's at least "censorship", and probably also "dictatorship".
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by mirimir on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:52AM
(#16836544)
Well, Google already left China.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by mirimir on Saturday April 14, 2018 @03:27AM
(#16836319)
Yes, that is a foreseeable outcome.
But Google would probably say "no" to many of them.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by greglindahl on Friday April 13, 2018 @08:28PM
(#16835093)
Even if Google can resist the EU about global censorship, small search engines can't afford to.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by ghaff on Saturday April 14, 2018 @08:54AM
(#16837100)
Or they just don't do business in the EU. Lots of US businesses (and, for that matter Chinese, Japanese, etc.) just do business in their home countries. To the degree the EU makes it too difficult for certain types of businesses to operate there, they won't. It's a big market but it's not that big. If businesses can pull out of China because they can't reasonably operate there, they can pull out of Europe.
The EU has pressured Google to censor its results globally, as I recall. But Google has prevailed on that, at least. So far, anyway.