Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by chrononaut on Friday April 13, 2018 @07:50PM
(#16834915)
While valid, only a fraction of the population would know to do this, and then a smaller fraction would believe it's worthwhile. It's an added inconvenience that has to outweigh the disadvantages of not doing it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by jtbayly on Saturday April 14, 2018 @12:09PM
(#16837924)
You're missing an even bigger issue. How would know that your search results are missing something in the first place?
You're not going to use a VPN to search "from another country" unless you already know or suspect something but can't find any information on it and suspect the reason is because you are searching from the EU rather than the USA!
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by unilynx on Saturday April 14, 2018 @01:12PM
(#16838251)
Google says so at the bottom of the page if results have been removed for your search
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by mirimir on Friday April 13, 2018 @08:00PM
(#16834953)
True. And thanks for confirming my supposition. It's rare to see this mentioned in coverage of the issue. For reasons that are understandable, I guess.
The EU has pressured Google to censor its results globally, as I recall. But Google has prevailed on that, at least. So far, anyway.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by michaelmrose on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:33AM
(#16836193)
Further if Europe can ask for info to be censored what happens when 100 other nations ask the same for their own reasons. Will the search index be composed only of data that is acceptable to all parties?
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by shandor on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:08AM
(#16836433)
When EU dictates what can be in the search index it is "right to be forgotten".
When China or Russia does it, it's at least "censorship", and probably also "dictatorship".
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by mirimir on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:52AM
(#16836544)
Well, Google already left China.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by mirimir on Saturday April 14, 2018 @03:27AM
(#16836319)
Yes, that is a foreseeable outcome.
But Google would probably say "no" to many of them.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by greglindahl on Friday April 13, 2018 @08:28PM
(#16835093)
Even if Google can resist the EU about global censorship, small search engines can't afford to.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by ghaff on Saturday April 14, 2018 @08:54AM
(#16837100)
Or they just don't do business in the EU. Lots of US businesses (and, for that matter Chinese, Japanese, etc.) just do business in their home countries. To the degree the EU makes it too difficult for certain types of businesses to operate there, they won't. It's a big market but it's not that big. If businesses can pull out of China because they can't reasonably operate there, they can pull out of Europe.