Re:Publisher Gets Carte Blanche to Seize New Sci-Hub Domains
by Dylan16807 on Thursday April 12, 2018 @11:09PM
(#16826874)
It's very incidental, though, and most of it could be purged with mild effort.
Re:Publisher Gets Carte Blanche to Seize New Sci-Hub Domains
by chroma on Friday April 13, 2018 @12:43AM
(#16827174)
The whole point of a blockchain is that it's append-only. Each block has a hash of the previous block. If you wanted to modify a Bitcoin block from a year ago, you'd have to do the same computation as a year worth of all miners.
Re:Publisher Gets Carte Blanche to Seize New Sci-Hub Domains
by Dylan16807 on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:52PM
(#16839432)
The blocks are hash trees, and you don't need to store the whole tree. Purging depends on that, not altering the block history.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16617136
Thus, it would be better (if it could be afforded --- see some of the other comments on cost estimates) to continue there, or perhaps one of the other altcoins that's already in use for monetary purposes.