News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by fbelzile on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:02PM (#16812482)
Agreed. I have no problem paying for subscriptions when warranted (content such as Netflix, utilities, etc...)

The issue I have is when this model is applied to certain software that doesn't directly provide added value over time (like Office 365 or Photoshop).

When I purchase software, I want the ability to clearly compare the available features (value) vs the cost at that specific time. This is why Sendy (https://sendy.co) received my business over MailChimp (https://mailchimp.com). The software I sell is also a pay-once model and I feel much happier knowing my customers are getting good value for their money.

Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by scarface74 on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @10:18PM (#16817487)
You can buy Office for a one time cost of $149 for one conputer. I don't have a problem paying $9.99 a month or $99 a year for Office 365 for 5 computers and 5 tablets and phones. With 5 installations, that's enough for my laptop, my wife's, both of my sons and my mom. I can also use it on my iPad.

DropBox and Apple charge $100 a year for a terabyte of storage alone.

I really like JetBrains perpetual license, after a year, you get a permanent license to the version that was current 12 months from the time you subscribed - if you cancel your subscription in April 2018, you get to a license to whatever version was current April 2027.

Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by taytus on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:29PM (#16812764)
>The issue I have is when this model is applied to certain software that doesn't directly provide added value over time

As a professional photographer, Photoshop does provide value over time for me and my colleagues.

Why would you pay for something that you don't use?

I honestly don't understand what the problem is, if something doesn't add value, then why would you pay for it?. I don't see a real "issue" here.

Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by Domenic_S on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:52PM (#16813035)
He said added value over time in exchange for a subscription. Photoshop has value, that's why it's being purchased; GP is saying that the subscription doesn't add anything additional, which I kind of agree with for a program as mature as PS.

It's a lease vs. buy calculation -- one site who did the math says:

> However, once you get past the two year mark, all bets are off—the subscription is more expensive than buying, even if you plan on upgrading every two years.

https://lifehacker.com/5904416/rent-vs-buy-is-adobes-creativ...

Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by patorjk on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @02:01PM (#16813715)
If you just wanted Photoshop and not the cloud storage, your best bet would be the Photography plan, which is $10 a month and includes Photoshop and Lightroom. Placing the data in Excel, and assuming someone were to take the $585 Amazon price for Photoshop and upgrade every 2 years, it would take 14 years before that was a better deal than using the subscription plan. If you assume the $700 price tag, it takes 25 years. However, it only takes 3 years if you use the student plan numbers (though as a side note, it looks like the subscription plan is the only way to get Photoshop now).
Re:Subscribers are the new, new thing in business by Domenic_S on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @04:10PM (#16815030)
The math is different today because there's a $10 photography plan that didn't exist when CC launched, and as you point out you can't buy PS outright anymore.