Re:RSS is undead
by AlexeyMK on Monday April 09, 2018 @09:20AM
(#16792733)
Danny Crighton has a CS degree from Stanford. I'm not entirely convinced by the article either, but your criticism would be a bit more credible if you managed to avoid being factually wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:RSS is undead
by matte_black on Monday April 09, 2018 @09:26AM
(#16792781)
You can have a CS degree and never code.
Re:RSS is undead
by johnchristopher on Monday April 09, 2018 @09:45AM
(#16792891)
I had one of those around (in a manager position of course) that told me in a meeting: "I don't see why you make it seems like it's hard and needs planning to get an app for project X. It's just some embedded html and with HTML5 you get geolocation so it'll be easy and quick. Besides our contractor already has an app so he just needs to add some javascript to it".
What in the article required being an active programmer?
Re:RSS is undead
by matte_black on Monday April 09, 2018 @10:31AM
(#16793246)
Perspective
That said, i have encountered many a myopic active programmer...
Well Said !
Certainly not in Portuguese universities, unless you got the degree with some "help", like a few of our politicians.
I'd avoid saying anything at all if the article wasn't factually wrong about RSS being a disused format.
And there's nothing factually wrong about RSS providing weaker data to ad-tech survellance. The only reason it's being pushed back onto the front burner, is because the Facebook election botch has got everyone spooked about analytics trackers, and lots of richer sources are going dark, putting RSS back on an even footing with the usual web tracker data sources, because everyone is blocking thirdparty scripts and resources.
Meanwhile, pretty sure the guy is operating as a tool for a paycheck sourced from the industry the article serves, and having qualifications only helps to support such theories, since credibility makes the opinion of a stooge all the more valuable. Maybe I should lump you in with him.