News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on “Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO”. Parent comment

Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by icc97 on Sunday March 18, 2018 @06:48PM (#16614957)
Can we also ban Elsevier and get Google to replace their links with Sci-Hub links?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by fragmede on Sunday March 18, 2018 @07:18PM (#16615088)
On the version of Internet from the 90's?

Totally.

Could anything like that happen on the CommerceNet, post EME (Encrypted Media Extensions)? (Sept, 2017)

Hardly. (And your name is now on a list for suggesting something so subersive, citizen.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by jkaplowitz on Sunday March 18, 2018 @07:23PM (#16615118)
Google didn't exist on the version of the Internet from most of the 90's. :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by qbrass on Sunday March 18, 2018 @09:58PM (#16615715)
Those few years of overlap were epic.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by oh_sigh on Sunday March 18, 2018 @07:40PM (#16615195)
Fairly sure google isn't going to promote pirated content over above-board content, regardless of how a large part of the community feels about it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:“Pinterest needs to be removed from Google IMO” by YawningAngel on Sunday March 18, 2018 @07:08PM (#16615049)
ScienceDirect articles shouldn't be indexed unless they have a readable abstract. I realise that isn't quite where you're going though ;)
[ Parent | on HN ]