News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by olefoo on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @12:35PM (#16538055)
Have you considered the incentives that they have when talking to a paying customer? Particularly one that is going to rate them based on the interaction?

Of course they "love their job"; they want to create a positive experience in the mind of someone who has a lot of power over them.

What I'm saying is that your anecdata has an observer effect that you are strongly discounting.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by moate on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:00PM (#16538319)
Also: most waiters think your jokes are funny, and every stripper thinks you're very handsom.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by NelsonMinar on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @02:37PM (#16539148)
Article from 2014 about how Uber drivers can't be honest, to protect their jobs: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/09/against-sharing/
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by piracykills on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @02:16PM (#16538970)
I don't think that's really valid here - you're asking them for an opinion of their job, not their opinion of you. What they think of their job has nothing to do with how I'll rate them. Heck, I may rate them higher or tip them better if I feel sorry for them not making much money.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by edanm on Thursday March 08, 2018 @06:46AM (#16543758)
Yes, but they don't necessarily know how you specifically will act. It's better to just assume that having a positive and happy discussion is better.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by BurningFrog on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @10:57PM (#16542168)
Have you considered that the fact that they keep driving is a strong indicator that they think it's the best possible way they can spend their time?

Two can play this game :)

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by pimmen on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:10AM (#16542663)
Have you considered it might the best possible way to spend their time because they have hardships finding another job?
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by BurningFrog on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:44AM (#16542774)
Of course!

I think most of us go to our current jobs only because we have a hard time finding a better one!

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by pimmen on Thursday March 08, 2018 @03:13AM (#16543075)
So, it wouldn't be too crazy to think then that those hardships finding another job would influence what they tell a customer asking them about whether or not they like their current job?
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by edanm on Thursday March 08, 2018 @06:50AM (#16543773)
Now you're asking something else than what was originally asked.

They might say good things about their job because of the incentives to be positive and fear or losing the job. That's one argument that can be made, which I think is probably at least somewhat true: they might not like their job, but they won't admit it.

What you're saying now is something else (if I understood correctly) - you're saying they only think good things about their job, because they can't get another job. That's a totally different thing! That argument is: they like their job, but for specific reasons. An argument I find a lot less compelling (because it's always true!).

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by savanaly on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @02:24PM (#16539029)
If I collected the same anecdata with Uber drivers I know in real life, not in the context of an uber ride, would the observer effect still apply?
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by amelius on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @02:36PM (#16539143)
Yes, lots of people brag about their jobs, life, see Facebook.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by pimmen on Thursday March 08, 2018 @01:11AM (#16542665)
Then you're subject to sample bias.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by allthenews on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:03PM (#16538338)
What incentives? A 4 instead of 5 star rating, and maybe a $1-5 tip? For answering a question honestly?

I think your incentives are overstated. Excluding some kind of egregious slight, riders have very little influence over drivers.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by doorbumper on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:14PM (#16538438)
That is not overstated. The rating has a significant impact on their livelihood. In addition, tips are 100% profit. I'm sure $5 is chump change to you, but a $5 tip an hour would be 60% pay increase.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by allthenews on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:21PM (#16538499)
Well, there's no way for us to prove either side, but I suspect that $5 tips are rare, and given the enthusiasm of many of my drivers, I don't expect that many of them would feel the need to lie on the off chance that they might get a nice tip.

Also, consider that sob stories confer tips too. Why not convince your customer that uber is abusing you, but you have nowhere else to go?

I suppose we are just arguing over anecdote; however, my point is that the simple preponderance of drivers is evidence that by and large they are indeed satisfied, as they report to me when I ask.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by zasz on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:32PM (#16538590)
> Also, consider that sob stories confer tips too. Why not convince your customer that uber is abusing you, but you have nowhere else to go?

Not in the context of providing a professional service, it doesn't. When was the last time you tipped a waiter or waitress more for a sob story? People want to be catered to when they're paying for a service, and part of that is not having to worry about other people's negative emotions.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by dbajakkchs on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:48PM (#16538732)
Why do you think $5 tips are rare? 20% rounded up to the nearest dollar is my usual practice, and I don’t think of myself as someone who throws money around.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by lotsofpulp on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @03:34PM (#16539605)
That is crazy to me. 15% is for good service, 20% might be for exceptional service. It's already a percent, no need to adjust for inflation.

I love seeing college kids tip 25% at food trucks with their clover iPad or square terminal. First of all, there is no waiter or service, and secondly, the options presented are 18%, 20%, and 25% or something equally stupid. I'm always fascinated that these kids with no income have no problem hitting the 25% button...for nothing.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by fwip on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @04:46PM (#16540220)
College kids know what it's like to be broke, and on average, feel that food-service workers don't make enough money.

It's like the studies that show that poor people give a greater share of their income to charity.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by pessimizer on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @05:15PM (#16540472)
I'm a 10% for bad service, 20% for not bad service kind of guy. It honestly takes all of my internal effort not to tip 20% for bad service.

> ...for nothing.

...for to pay someone who is working for them. The indirection of wage labor isn't enough of an excuse for me to not attempt to make sure the person who is working for me is compensated to my standard.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by lotsofpulp on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @06:39PM (#16541020)
Then you're letting employers take advantage of you. The whole tip system is a scam in the first place. It should be a business's responsibility to price appropriately.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by deadmetheny on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @03:45PM (#16539716)
A 25% tip is crazy. Our machine shows 15%, 20%, and "other", and I'd say we average something like 10% in tips any given day. Considering the level of service one gets from a food truck, that feels pretty fair to me.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by username223 on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @02:17PM (#16538974)
This is a good rule for interacting with tipped US workers in general: be generous, and tip in cash. Tips are a way for companies to save money by avoiding taxes, and a way for workers to be paid without their employers taking a cut. If you think Uber is paying your driver less than minimum wage, make up the difference in cash. Also, "internet points" in the form of stars cost you nothing, so give your driver five stars unless he was completely incompetent.
Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by zaarn on Thursday March 08, 2018 @04:45AM (#16543379)
Luckily I live in a country where I don't have to ensure the survival of my taxi driver or waiter by giving them a tip.

They get paid decently from the start.

Re:Economist behind Uber study admits error, adjusts numbers by zasz on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @01:30PM (#16538575)
Drivers get booted off the Uber platform when their ratings go too low, so riders have plenty of power. https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-mysterious-way-uber-bans-d...

"For a Harvard student, the median grade is an A- and for an Uber driver, anything below a 4.7 out of 5 average rating from passengers spells trouble. Or, as one driver memorably puts it on Uber People, a popular web forum for rideshare drivers: “4.6 is [a] death zone.”"

As for finding out what Uber drivers actually think, you can google "uber driver forum." A unionization vote was called in one of those forums, and something like 96% of the drivers voted yes. Not a sign that they're happy with their lot, not at all.