News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's Python Class by Cyph0n on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @05:25PM (#16532652)
A better analogy would be IBM releasing a tutorial for an unsupported version of COBOL and calling it a tutorial for "modern" COBOL.

In a nutshell, it's not about Python 2 being old, it's about calling Python 2 "Python" when that hasn't been the case for a few years now at the least.

Re:Google's Python Class by mieseratte on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @10:44PM (#16534104)
> A better analogy would be IBM releasing a tutorial for an unsupported version of COBOL and calling it a tutorial for "modern" COBOL.

Well, no, they've made no comparable claim.

From skimming the material, not only does Google not refer to Python as "modern" but provide the caveat

> For Google's Python Class, it's best to use Python 2.7. Although Python 3.x is becoming more popular, this course is designed for Python 2.6 or later.

I suppose to some folks they should provide a disclaimer with road flares warning of Danger Ahead, but it's not as if they're intentionally misleading.

Re:Google's Python Class by Cyph0n on Tuesday March 06, 2018 @11:26PM (#16534238)
That doesn't sound like a caveat at all.

"Becoming more popular" should instead be "will be the only supported version of Python from 2020 onwards".

Unless the reader is aware of the state of Python 2 vs. 3, he/she wouldn't even bat an eye.

Re:Google's Python Class by mieseratte on Wednesday March 07, 2018 @08:06AM (#16536066)
> Unless the reader is aware of the state of Python 2 vs. 3, he/she wouldn't even bat an eye.

If I were looking at learning Python and read that line I'd stop and dig a little deeper.

I hate on Google as much as the next neo-Luddite, but they're putting out quality material on a topic that some folks will need. Y'all are pretty damn hateful.