Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Free Speech and Privacy

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by rgbrenner on Sunday March 04, 2018 @10:10PM (#16518462)

Read their faq... this question and the one after it: http://humantraffickingpreventionact.com/#q2

They encourage retailers and manufacturers to charge more than the $20 and pocket the difference. They are marketing the bill as pro-business.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by deathanatos on Sunday March 04, 2018 @10:30PM (#16518540)

The writing and grammar on that site is terrible, but the double-entendre on that question takes the cake:

> the retailers can set the amount to be what it feels the market can bare.

I'm hoping that wasn't intentional.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by DavidSJ on Sunday March 04, 2018 @11:34PM (#16518740)

The writing and grammar on that site is terrible,

I’m sorry to do this, but I think you mean that the writing and grammar are terrible, not that they is terrible.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by heartbreak on Sunday March 04, 2018 @11:37PM (#16518753)

Things aren't always what they seem.

Fish and chips is what I had for dinner.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by aspett on Sunday March 04, 2018 @10:14PM (#16518472)

This is mindblowing. "I can't believe" is so watered down it can not express the feeling felt when reading things like this. This past year has been insanity - this is just insanity..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lawmakers Want to Block Pornography at the Expense of Fre... by userbinator on Sunday March 04, 2018 @10:22PM (#16518503)

"I can't believe" is so watered down it can not express the feeling felt when reading things like this.

I believe the suitable phrase is now "I can't even."

[ Parent | on HN ]