But then again, this stuff sells in the news, so why suspect ulterior motives ;)
I realize it's a very persuasive-feeling impression. It's increasingly the first thing people bring up to account for disagreement, but that is a huge problem. Overwhelmingly the real reason for disagreement is that people just disagree, and we get nowhere by pretending otherwise.
It would have been good if we had caught the original post (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16497551) getting penalized by the flamewar detector and turned that off. We often do that, and even have the software set up to email us notifications to check such things. Had the story had a few more hours on the front page, the point would be moot. Unfortunately we missed that and it's too late now. But the story is certain to develop further, and when significant new information is available, HN can have another big thread. Not before, though.
76 points https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16498586
351 points https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16497551
17 points https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16513739
23 points https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16504820
58 points https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16500834
Sixth time it seems.