News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by curiousgal on Friday March 02, 2018 @11:55PM (#16507952)
Didn't Martha Stewart go to prison over something like that?
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by mikestew on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:10AM (#16508006)
To summarize, Martha Stewart went to prison for lying to Federal authorities. [0] Securities fraud was not part of what she was found guilty of, AFAIK. I dunno, much like someone here said about Icahn, you think she's risking prison for a loss of less than $50K? I don't have nearly her money, and I wouldn't.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Stewart#Sentence

Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by joe_the_user on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:18AM (#16508031)
Icahn, unlike Stewart, is a professional stock speculator. There's every reason to think a speculator makes their money "running their connections".

Moreover, if anything, Stewart's manifestly unfair and abusive case shows prosecutors choose their examples based not on how dirty the target is but rather how convenient they are. Those who go down, don't go down based on how much they break or skirt the law but based on their connections to power failing.

Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by pasbesoin on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:35AM (#16508076)
I really dislike this aspect of our system, where participants (e.g. prosecutors) have so much motivation to build a personal career, over purpose to serve justice evenly, or sometimes even at all.
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by djsumdog on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:42AM (#16508096)
I was really surprised when I discovered this. Intentionally lying to a federal agent about anything material is grounds for criminal charges. Technically even a postal inspector. The police can lie to you all they want, but if you lie to a FBI agent in a line of questioning, it's not covered under the 1st amendment. It's not considered freedom of speech.
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by dreamcompiler on Saturday March 03, 2018 @03:16PM (#16511326)
Right. Any time a federal official asks you a question other than "How's the weather?" your response should always be "I cannot comment before consulting with my attorney."
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by tristanj on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:09AM (#16508004)
Technically no. Martha Stewart went to prison for making false statements, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice. She was never charged with insider trading.
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by tachyoff on Friday March 02, 2018 @11:57PM (#16507964)
She wasn’t powerful enough to avoid the consequences.
Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by joe_the_user on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:12AM (#16508013)
The parent's point deserves consideration

Martha Stewart wound up being prosecuted for "obstruction of justice" and "conspiracy", the go-to offenses when prosecutions otherwise hit a wall.

Stewart's prosecution came at time when insider trading appeared common and when regulators were looking for a visible victory. A celebrity prosecution gets a lot of press without actually angering people with real power. Stewart was a mere millionaire, not a multimillionaire or billionaire.

Edit: Well, I stand corrected, she was a multimillionaire at the time. Still it's hard not to see her as relatively small potatoes in the world of stocks.

https://www.thoughtco.com/martha-stewarts-insider-trading-ca...

Re:Carl Icahn dumps $31M in steel-related stocks before Whit... by paulcole on Saturday March 03, 2018 @12:20AM (#16508042)
Stewart was worth 10s of millions, probably closer to 100. I don’t get how that isn’t a multimillionaire.