News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotify Form F-1 by foepys on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @03:32PM (#16486564)
> Even their cross platform support is the best.

Even if it's based on Electron, their Linux desktop client at least exists and this is reason enough for me to keep being a subscriber. The web player is working but is missing features and has some major bugs (e.g., I cannot "dislike" a song on a playlist). My one wish would be for it to get on the same level of playlist management that Amarok, Foobar2000 and similar music players were on like 15 years ago...

Amazon Music's desktop client, despite also being Electron-based, is only available on Windows and Mac and its usability is so bad, I cannot even describe it. There is a reason why Amazon Music is a lot cheaper: it's worse in every metric beside costs that I were evaluating.

Re:Spotify Form F-1 by diggan on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @03:56PM (#16486825)
Since when is Spotify a Electron application? I recall it having the UI made with JavaScript, HTML and CSS but all the rest is handled with C++. Think they were using Chromium Embedded Framework.
Re:Spotify Form F-1 by foepys on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @04:32PM (#16487208)
Oh, I were under the impression that it's electron. Even better then.
Re:Spotify Form F-1 by arghwhat on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @03:55PM (#16486819)
> despite also being Electron-based, is only available on Windows and Mac

Electron does not make cross-compilation easy. It's about as cumbersome as building any other C++ project for multiple platforms.

Re:Spotify Form F-1 by kristianc on Wednesday February 28, 2018 @04:38PM (#16487276)
As far as I know the Ubuntu port was made by Canonical and is a Snap package, not an Electron app.