News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by jadedhacker on Saturday February 24, 2018 @05:45PM (#16455902)
You're right, being the kind of citizen you want to be is undeniable a good thing, but it's also undeniably useless. It individualizes a collective problem, thereby being an ineffective solution. The only way to resist power is with collective action that substantially challenges it.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mulmen on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:01PM (#16455992)
I disagree with your defeatist message and I consider it harmful if spread. Individual action is the foundation of our entire social system. It is not "useless" by any measure.

I don't want to use AMP in email so I'm not going to. It's just that easy.

What are you doing and what do you suggest the rest of us do? Is voting with our wallets not a thing any longer?

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by Avshalom on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:43PM (#16456441)
And how productive do you think "voting with our wallets" can be for a product we don't pay for from a company with more money than all of us combined?
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by username223 on Saturday February 24, 2018 @09:02PM (#16456705)
You're "voting with your data," which for a company like Google is essentially the same thing. If you don't hand them data, they can't monetize it.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by tscs37 on Sunday February 25, 2018 @09:48AM (#16459178)
Google auotmatically collects data on you the moment you visit and site with Google Analytics or a +1 button or when using Google Ads. Or using youtube.

While it's certainly not totally impossible to vote with your data, you should remember that you are the product for google. The customers are advertisers. Not you.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by tekknik on Monday February 26, 2018 @09:15AM (#16465356)
Some of us do/did pay for gmail. Also you could stop using Google all together as I have for this exact reason. (Specifically no way to disable AMP). I’ve been using bing/duckduckgo for search and icloud for email for a few years now. The only reason Google gets away with any of this crap is how many people refuse to switch to another service so yes voting with your wallet/wall clock will get results.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mulmen on Sunday February 25, 2018 @05:25PM (#16461561)
You're right, we should just use Google for everything because they have money. All is lost. Thanks for opening my eyes, you have really made a positive impact.

/s

On a serious note I don't like the negativity in your comment and I don't think there is anything insightful about it. I believe the free market is based on individual actions. I will continue to choose services based on how well they serve my needs.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by ocdtrekkie on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:48PM (#16456452)
That's the problem with Google being the default search for almost all browsers and almost all phones: The entire tech industry could unite against Google, and Google still has literally billions of users who don't know better.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by baddox on Saturday February 24, 2018 @08:42PM (#16456634)
Probably at least slightly more productive that literally voting in actual elections.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by Avshalom on Saturday February 24, 2018 @08:51PM (#16456669)
If I had a solution I'd be telling you about it I assure you. I'm just saying that vote with your wallet and put your faith in the market is also not a solution in this case.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by k_sh on Saturday February 24, 2018 @06:35PM (#16456140)
Jumping in under here to highlight your first point: collective action is, literally, a large set of coordinated individual actions.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by jadedhacker on Saturday February 24, 2018 @11:12PM (#16457086)
That's true but the key word is coordinated. Without coordinated action, we're back at individual action. Coordinated action might be protests, boycotts, etc. Usually there are one or more _institutions_, that is a cohesive group of people, backing and advancing the interests of the group. This is a very powerful model.

A familiar example is the NRA. It's not a political party, but it advances the interests of its members relentlessly. Institutions of the left include things like Planned Parenthood. Often, there are issue advocacy organizations that spring up when corporations are doing bad things. Often the strategy is to do things that impact the corporation financially, which short of legal threats is basically the only thing they understand. Anything short of that can be brushed off with rationalizations by various powerful stakeholders within the corporation.

Basically, the point I'm trying to make is that individual action is essential, but not sufficient to make a difference when it counts.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mr_spothawk on Sunday February 25, 2018 @12:05AM (#16457230)
funny thing that, I went to the their membership page for the first time today because I wanted to know how to express my individual support. I'm not an owner, and I will likely get a membership ... because it's an advocacy I care about.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by ballenf on Sunday February 25, 2018 @09:40AM (#16459138)
People may not like a compromise approach, but I've switched to using standard IMAP-based mail readers with gmail. If more people did that instead of using the gmail app and web site, Google would maybe see that AMP'd email wouldn't reach a large number of their customers.

Then again, maybe AMP is their solution to this third-party interface "problem": create an incompatible "feature" that will encourage or force users to abandon standards-based tools.

Kind of like what's happened with Google Talk. God I miss the Mac's Messages app being able to interface with my work's gsuite chat.

FWIW, the iOS email client has improved a lot over the last few iOS versions. Worth checking out if you haven't looked at it for a while.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by jadedhacker on Saturday February 24, 2018 @11:17PM (#16457100)
I actually intended my message to be inspiring. ;)

My point was that you can't go it alone and there are friends that will help you. I left a more theoretical justification in another sub-thread.