News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by Avshalom on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:43PM (#16456441)
And how productive do you think "voting with our wallets" can be for a product we don't pay for from a company with more money than all of us combined?
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by username223 on Saturday February 24, 2018 @09:02PM (#16456705)
You're "voting with your data," which for a company like Google is essentially the same thing. If you don't hand them data, they can't monetize it.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by tscs37 on Sunday February 25, 2018 @09:48AM (#16459178)
Google auotmatically collects data on you the moment you visit and site with Google Analytics or a +1 button or when using Google Ads. Or using youtube.

While it's certainly not totally impossible to vote with your data, you should remember that you are the product for google. The customers are advertisers. Not you.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by tekknik on Monday February 26, 2018 @09:15AM (#16465356)
Some of us do/did pay for gmail. Also you could stop using Google all together as I have for this exact reason. (Specifically no way to disable AMP). I’ve been using bing/duckduckgo for search and icloud for email for a few years now. The only reason Google gets away with any of this crap is how many people refuse to switch to another service so yes voting with your wallet/wall clock will get results.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by mulmen on Sunday February 25, 2018 @05:25PM (#16461561)
You're right, we should just use Google for everything because they have money. All is lost. Thanks for opening my eyes, you have really made a positive impact.

/s

On a serious note I don't like the negativity in your comment and I don't think there is anything insightful about it. I believe the free market is based on individual actions. I will continue to choose services based on how well they serve my needs.

Re:AMP: the missing controversy by ocdtrekkie on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:48PM (#16456452)
That's the problem with Google being the default search for almost all browsers and almost all phones: The entire tech industry could unite against Google, and Google still has literally billions of users who don't know better.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by baddox on Saturday February 24, 2018 @08:42PM (#16456634)
Probably at least slightly more productive that literally voting in actual elections.
Re:AMP: the missing controversy by Avshalom on Saturday February 24, 2018 @08:51PM (#16456669)
If I had a solution I'd be telling you about it I assure you. I'm just saying that vote with your wallet and put your faith in the market is also not a solution in this case.