News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Containers won the battle, but will lose the war to serverless. Parent comment

Re:Containers won the battle, but will lose the war to serve... by k__ on Friday February 23, 2018 @08:50PM (#16451147)
And you have this with containers as with serverless. So no argument here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Containers won the battle, but will lose the war to serve... by ec109685 on Saturday February 24, 2018 @05:31AM (#16452651)
No, with Kubernetes, you specify, for example, that your app needs block store of a certain size or ingress at a certain port. The runtime knows how to satisfy that on each cloud.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Containers won the battle, but will lose the war to serve... by k__ on Saturday February 24, 2018 @07:25AM (#16452964)
What I meant was, when you set up the container and got your data in S3, it is in there, same goes with serverless.

Nobody prevents you to write your serverless function so it needs a block store of a certain size or ingress at a certain port.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Containers won the battle, but will lose the war to serve... by ec109685 on Tuesday February 27, 2018 @03:18AM (#16471872)
But there is no standard way to specify those requirements in a cloud agnostic manner.
[ Parent | on HN ]