News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Made Lisp Different (2002) by dang on Monday February 19, 2018 @01:10AM (#16411071)
I suspect you'd find that what look like surface differences actually go deeper into the meanings of programs, like a plant whose roots go deeper than one would expect.
Re:What Made Lisp Different (2002) by le-mark on Monday February 19, 2018 @10:38AM (#16413470)
There's a special level of Hell that involves streaming xml processing and cobol. Since cobol lacks dynamic memory allocation (speaking of cobol 85 here) and you don't generally build things like linked lists or trees, there's a limited number of things you can conveniently do with streaming xml data. Many cobol programmers are left with a feeling of despair, I wager.

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is certainly real in programming languages[1].

[1] http://wiki.c2.com/?BlubParadox