This sounds... tautological. We can morally eat whatever we can eat? Does that include gorilla meat? Weaker humans?
If we ever come into contact with extraterrestrial life, I hope that they don't share this view.
It doesn't have to be; in fact, humans, animals, and the planet would be much better off in many ways were we to transition to plant-based diets:
Go vegan, save the planet https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/08/opinions/go-vegan-save-the-pl...
Five things would happen if everyone stopped eating meat http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/five-things-would-happen...
What would happen if everyone went vegan? https://www.bbcgoodfood.com/howto/guide/what-would-world-loo...
What the Health http://www.whatthehealthfilm.com
The Game Changers http://gamechangersmovie.com
Cowspiracy http://www.cowspiracy.com
Can you provide peer reviewed papers making claims comparable to the sources you provided?
[1] https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/science-and-health/2017/7/2...
For a meticulously documented presentation, see "How Not To Die: The Role of Diet in Preventing, Arresting, and Reversing Our Top 15 Killers" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXXXygDRyBU
Point is, if you want to just reduce suffering while staying healthy (e.g. no iron / B12 deficiency) there may be better answers than just to restrict oneself to the one half of living creatures that happens to generate its own food from CO2.
The turn was after hooking you on all of the feelings by anthropomorphizing the plants more to you, then went back to cold logical examination that there is no structure in the plant for pain or learning and literally pointed out the manipulation they did. Radiolab does this a lot, manipulates the listener to get you meta insight into yourself.
We surely can't be that far off of this now?
Diet is not one-size-fits all, and we have basically no idea how complex diet is, or the specific long term effects of most dietary interventions on people. It is absolutely reprehensible to represent going vegan as an obvious way forward when it is unclear that it's even safe for a large majority of people.
In addition, many people are unable to eat yeast or yeast extracts, which are among the few commonly available non-flesh sources of the crucial vitamin B12.
[0]: http://mikhailapeterson.com/2017/12/18/zero-carb-carnivore-d...
If your Tolstoy quote is accurate, it seems fairly sloppy reasoning to me. Animal protein is an essential component of nourishing billions of people. Calling sustenance “appetite” is a rhetorical flourish which undermines the argument.
I think what would be immoral is telling billions of people they can’t eat meat.
There are many ways one could prescribe humans should act to minimize their impact on the flora and fauna of our world. But at the same time, humans are entitled to a certain degree of leeway in this regard. Sustainably eating the plants and animals beneath us on the food chain is one of those areas.