Re:The IRS’s Effort to Convert Its Assembly Codebase to Java
by jfoutz on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @03:52PM
(#16379246)
you could also just dust off the original specification. code up whatever it's supposed to do, then special case all of the junk that doesn't match.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The IRS’s Effort to Convert Its Assembly Codebase to Java
by mlindner on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @06:17PM
(#16380482)
There rarely is an original specification, and even if one exists, what was actually written has a high probably of not actually matching the specification exactly because of undocumented feature requests or additions.
Re:The IRS’s Effort to Convert Its Assembly Codebase to Java
by SiempreViernes on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @05:34PM
(#16380144)
You did read the bit that said the current system is the accumulation of almost 60 years of changing tax legislation, right?
Re:The IRS’s Effort to Convert Its Assembly Codebase to Java
by jfoutz on Wednesday February 14, 2018 @07:43PM
(#16380991)
Yeah, ~30 year projects were the longest i've ever worked on. Sometimes it's easier to read the docs about what the old programmers were trying to do - those telephone sized documents explaining requirements. if you're lucky, they might have started using source control in the 90's and you can kinda match up specs to commits.