Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by yoz-y on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @03:42AM
(#16365649)
I think it does work. Although I consider myself pretty "immune" to advertising I know I am not. I do not buy off-brand toothpaste or store labeled coke. I do buy detergent I have seen in advertising and so on. All this while knowing that some TESCO detergent would be probably perfectly fine.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by Veen on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @04:30AM
(#16365856)
Detergent is one of the areas that I am “brand immune” because there’s really no difference in cleaning power between a cheap bleach you can buy by the gallon and branded cleaning products that are orders of magnitude more expensive. The same is true of many health and beauty products: same stuff, different branding.
Then again, I’ve spent lots of money on Apple products because there’s something I value associated with that brand.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by matt4077 on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @05:04AM
(#16366009)
There actually are meaningful differences in detergent: pricier brands contain all sorts of things besides soap, such as proteases and lipases (proteins that break down proteins and fats in foods and other dirt of biological origin), or colouring agents.
It's not enough for me to make a difference, considering I don't spend much time in dirt. But if I had children, I'm sure I'd try different brands.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by babuskov on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @03:48AM
(#16365670)
> People just don’t care and won’t listen.
Not consciously. But when you get into a store and want to buy a shampoo or toothpaste, you are more likely to buy a brand you have heard of than something completely unknown.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by bloak on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @05:18AM
(#16366067)
That is true, but it has little to do with advertising. In the absence of other evidence I buy the product that costs least per gram/litre. In most cases that's the supermarket's own brand, which is also the brand I've most likely to have heard of, because it's difficult not to have heard of Tesco or Sainsbury's when you're in Tesco or Sainsbury's. The choice between Tesco and Sainsbury's is determined by location and transport options. They're not usually right next to each other so that you've got to decide between them on their merits.
Note that in the case of consumables, like shampoo or toothpaste, there's almost no risk in getting the cheapest: if it turns out to be crap you'll mentally blacklist it and buy the second cheapest next time if the blacklisted product is still the cheapest. Buying a car is a very different matter.
Re:Unilever threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Goog...
by fjsolwmv on Tuesday February 13, 2018 @10:52PM
(#16373316)
You are a bargain hunter. The majority of the consumer spending is not. And your store brand is made by the same company that buys ad for their product and creates demand for the flavor of toothpaste you like.
PS: I’m not referring to actionable ads, but mere advertising to boost brand awareness etc