Re:Researchers giving psilocybin to religious leaders (2017)
by dang on Friday February 09, 2018 @03:07PM
(#16343431)
You're right. Generally the best way to complain about a title is to suggest a better one. When people do that we frequently take the suggestion. "Better" here means accurate, neutral, and using representative language from the text itself.
In this case, though, it's a bit hard because the article is cobbled from multiple sources that aren't all about the same thing.
Edit: we changed the URL from https://qz.com/1196408/scientists-studying-psilocybin-accide.... Turned out that its two most substantive mainstream sources were about the same study. They threw in a Ted talk and some Alan Watts and made a vague mash. My self either found this annoying or imagined that it did, so it changed the URL to one of the articles about the ongoing study.
In this case, though, it's a bit hard because the article is cobbled from multiple sources that aren't all about the same thing.
Edit: we changed the URL from https://qz.com/1196408/scientists-studying-psilocybin-accide.... Turned out that its two most substantive mainstream sources were about the same study. They threw in a Ted talk and some Alan Watts and made a vague mash. My self either found this annoying or imagined that it did, so it changed the URL to one of the articles about the ongoing study.