News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by velmu on Monday February 05, 2018 @04:48AM (#16307746)
I think the time would be ripe time for a second try at this . It's something tweaks to DST and Timezones* wont fix.

I still struggle figuring out times globally, without good reason. Local time could still be the regular 24h, but for business meetings, etc. something like Swatch Internet Time would be great.

* https://metropolitan.fi/entry/finland-seeks-to-drop-daylight...

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by endymi0n on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @07:45AM (#16315886)
So you want to abolish time zones... (I see you don't, completely, but this one's gold in any case):

https://qntm.org/abolish

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by upofadown on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @08:37AM (#16316115)
That was silly. It reminded me of one of those "where did the soda go?" infomercials in that it assumed an extreme level of incompetence on the part of the viewer. All the difficulties of the product (time zones) were ignored while all the difficulties of alternative ways of doing things were exaggerated past the point of possible satire.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by goblin89 on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @10:42AM (#16316922)
Chances of adopting a universal timezone are pretty much nonexistent for political reasons, and the switch itself would probably be a bit of a logistical nightmare. However, claiming universal timezone in itself would be any difficult to use does seem a bit disingenuous.

Consider: in a world with timezones, all you need to know is what time’s in Melbourne right now, and what time Steve’s typically awake these days. In a world without timezones, all you need to know is what time Steve’s typically awake these days.

What about 0000 hitting in the middle of the day? Well, a bar I recently went to is open “Thu–Sat 8pm to 4am, Sun 8pm to 2am, Mon–Wed off”. In a world without timezones I don’t think anyone would be confused by a sign like “Sun–Fri 2300 to 0500” at a post office or barber shop.

We have tools to deal with timezones, so that complexity is pretty much hidden these days. That said, I can’t help but notice every now and then how leaky the abstraction is. Humans are not machines—more and more people work independently or on flexible office hours, many businesses are routinely open different times depending on the season even if the country uses DST, and so on.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by Cyberdog on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @11:38AM (#16317377)
In Japan (and perhaps elsewhere in east Asia?), it's common to see, for example, a bar which is open from 5:00 PM to 2:00 AM to have a sign advertising its open hours as "17:00 - 26:00." It looks silly at first but the meaning is easy to understand.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by goblin89 on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @04:18PM (#16319834)
Nope, here in South Korea they seem to prefer this “THU 21:00—05:00” format at least from what I’ve seen. I feel like fully adjusting to the Japanese format should hardly take anyone more than a few days though, even if it’s someone like me who has this internally defined type “hour” mapping to a positive integer not larger than 23
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by lb1lf on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @11:50AM (#16317471)
> Chances of adopting a universal timezone are pretty much nonexistent for political reasons(...)

-I was once told (and found it too amusing to verify the truth of it!) that as GMT took hold as the go-to global time reference, the French grudgingly complied, but referred to it as 'Paris time minus seven minutes and twenty-six seconds' or something to that effect.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by mseebach on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @09:39AM (#16316434)
It doesn't purport to give a balanced analysis of pros and cons, it's a (tongue-in-cheek) outline of the downsides that proponents of timezone abolishment never seem to consider.

Perhaps the writing is silly, but there's nothing silly about the point the point that of course people will maintain the solar day for daily life, and abolishing timezones will basically break time for most people (especially those whose "midnight" (and so the changing of the date and name of day) will land during the solar day).

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by upofadown on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @10:04AM (#16324818)
Whatever happens, the solar day stays the same. Time zones actually break the solar day. Freed from the constraints of time zones the solar day becomes its own thing. DST is just an ugly hack piled on top of the mess time zones created in an attempt to go back a ways to solar time.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by mseebach on Wednesday February 07, 2018 @04:02PM (#16327962)
No, DST has nothing at all to do with solar time. It's a hack alright, but it's not fixing any problem introduced by time zones.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by upofadown on Saturday February 10, 2018 @12:49PM (#16348473)
The first letter of DST stands for "Daylight". In the world before time zones people basically used three references based on sun position, sun rise, sun set and noon. The introduction of time zones decoupled noon from the time when the sun was at the highest and was part of the process that led to people doing things by the clock and not the sun. Because sun rise and set vary with respect to time zone time DST was an attempt to partially allow people to just start doing things when the sun came up.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by niftich on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @10:32AM (#16316852)
Swatch Internet Time and UTC solve the same problem: they both present a timezone- and locale-agnostic, almost-monotonous scale that's two-ways convertible with local times. Except UTC is more natural to reason about, because it looks like a local timestamp, and some people can do offset math in their head to approximate the real answer. You have to do much more conversions between Swatch Internet Time and local time, so you always need a tool.

The applicability of timestamp conventions for setting business meetings is largely dependent on how easily one can look up the same moment across multiple IANA timezones [1]. For example, looking up how typical local working hours cascade between different timezones [2]. If multi-converters like this became mainstream, Swatch Internet Time may very well have been a hit. But it wasn't, and such a tool, even for UTC, remains hard to find.

[1] https://www.iana.org/time-zones [2] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=...

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by Symbiote on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @07:43AM (#16315877)
What problem does Swatch Internet Time solve?

> for business meetings, etc. something like Swatch Internet Time would be great

Let's discuss this on 2018-06-07 at 04:30, UTC.

I thought Google would be the easiest source for a conversion, but for me a search for "04:30 UTC" gives a banner at the top, "17.30 Tuesday, in Denmark": https://www.google.dk/search?q=04%3A30+UTC

So maybe one problem it solves, is the American assumption that everyone uses the 12-hour clock.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by rhapsodic on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @08:34AM (#16316101)
>So maybe one problem it solves, is the American assumption that everyone uses the 12-hour clock.

I'm an American, and I was not aware of the "American assumption that everyone uses the 12-hour clock." Please elaborate further.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by eddieroger on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @09:14AM (#16316298)
I'm an American who chooses to use a 24 hour clock for all my digital ones, anyway, and didn't realize that American assumed anything about time like that. Instead, I assumed that it's up to the user's discretion, and they would set their computer settings appropriately (or not at all, since it's probably fine as localized), and in the case of Google, the computer would rely on those localization settings, as it did for "17:30 in Denmark."
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by Symbiote on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @12:22PM (#16317709)
> I assumed that it's up to the user's discretion, and they would set their computer settings appropriately

My computer is configured correctly, but it's rather common for an application (especially a phone app) or website to ignore those settings, or to think it knows better.

04:30 UTC means 04:30 UTC, or 05:30 in Denmark. Not 17:30!

The same can happen if I type something like "04:30 Catch flight" into an appointment in my Google Calendar. It is converted into a new appointment "16:30 Catch flight".

It's not just Google. "Your Office 365 subscription will automatically renew on 1/19/2018." and the admin interface is a mix of date and time formats.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by ams6110 on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @08:39AM (#16316120)
In Europe, most "official" times use a 24-hour clock (train schedules, etc.). This is almost never seen in America outside of the military and many Americans would need to stop and calculate what time "17:30" is.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by rhapsodic on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @09:02AM (#16316241)
>In Europe, most "official" times use a 24-hour clock (train schedules, etc.).

Uh, yeah, I'm well aware of that, as are most Americans I know. That's why I asked about "the American assumption that everyone uses the 12-hour clock". That must be a myth that non-Americans believe in.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by znpy on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @08:56AM (#16316200)
Sidenote: AFAIK, UK also uses an AM/PM format for time, instead of the unambiguous 24-hour format.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by pbhjpbhj on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @09:05AM (#16316251)
In typically British fashion we use both quite readily.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by stordoff on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @10:04AM (#16316613)
Both are used, and it's fairly arbitrary which is used - bus/train times are usually 24-hours, general speech is usually 12-hour unless referring to something that is already in 24-hour time (but even then some people will switch them to 12-hour), and I see appointment cards, invoices etc. using both.

It's definitely in keeping with how we mix meters/feet and pints/litres.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by howard941 on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @12:30PM (#16317777)
From what I gather watching UK TV there's also the charming and efficient use of "half X" to refer to thirty minutes after hour X.
Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by michaelcampbell on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @08:47AM (#16316158)
> is the American assumption that everyone uses the 12-hour clock.

C'mon, stop. So edgy.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by _jal on Tuesday February 06, 2018 @09:07AM (#16316262)
It appears you're unaware that many routinely countries use 24 hour ("military") time for many things.

It isn't quite so extreme as that edgy metric system trendiness all the kool kids seem to be in to these days, but, uh, there is a world out there.

Re:Swatch Internet Time (1998) by michaelcampbell on Saturday February 17, 2018 @05:39PM (#16403180)
I'm quite aware, thanks. I was talking about the reddit-esque "shit on anything done in the US" nonsense.