Ask HN: Malwaremonger’s moral bind
I have found a zero-day cross-platform exploit that is nasty (as in make-the-nightly-news nasty). Mitnick doesn’t want it. Zerodium doesn’t want it. Apple and Microsoft don’t even want to hear about it without my agreeing to give them exclusive rights to it (even to the exclusion of each other), before they even look at it.
What’s the right and moral thing to do next? Apple and Microsoft are making friendly (if half-hearted and half-assed) overtures to researchers with one hand while behind them are corporate lawyers preemptively giving all researchers the finger. These lawyers strike me as the very same bullies who took your lunch money in school, and ready to do it again.
Is there any path forward that involves the right people taking the exploit seriously and perhaps a reasonable bounty for my trouble? Or am I doomed to bury it, sell it on some darknet market to “tha NSA” or dump a guide on github?
(
12 comments
| 9 points
| on HN
)
The way you are asking mommy/daddy/uncle/aunty for who will pay more for your bug indicates you are not a trustworthy person and are not interested in doing the right thing. These companies will naturally not want to do business with you because you are not acting professionally.
Bug bounty programs run by Apple (for their other platforms) and Microsoft require you to agree to their draconian terms and conditions before you can even submit the bug.
As to the rest of those pithy comments, I'll try not to take them too much to heart.
That said, if you really want to do the right thing, you'd submit it to the companies running the bug bounties. They aren't going to pay you first just to hear what it is. That'd be blackmail. Either you trust the big companies to be fair and pay you, or you don't, but you should choose which.
Bug bounty programs run by Apple (for their other platforms) and Microsoft require you to agree to their draconian terms and conditions before you can even submit the bug.