Re:Hawaii "button pusher" refusing to cooperate with FCC, in...
by paulie_a on Friday January 26, 2018 @01:00AM
(#16237314)
No it was the same 4 codes, and the same message: "loud'
It definitely is from my teenage years but whenever I visit folks I drive by that tower a block away. You can tell nothing has been upgraded
Re:Hawaii "button pusher" refusing to cooperate with FCC, in...
by AdamJacobMuller on Friday January 26, 2018 @02:55AM
(#16237626)
This was just a siren then? Makes sense.
Smart system, really. Very simple to install/maintain and very simple to have a robust transmitter infrastructure around.
If you just substitute your 4-digit code for a longer, say, 64, digit one with some time-based component, and perhaps shift the required frequency too based on time, you actually end up with a very robust very simple system.
Re:Hawaii "button pusher" refusing to cooperate with FCC, in...
by Double_a_92 on Friday January 26, 2018 @03:34AM
(#16237757)
Re:Hawaii "button pusher" refusing to cooperate with FCC, in...
by gnode on Friday January 26, 2018 @08:35AM
(#16238973)
I disagree. The frequency hopping would make it harder for a signal jammer to prevent a legitimate transmission. If you can't predict the frequency on which the transmission is being listened for, you'd need to jam a broader spectrum, needing much more power to perform the attack.
I'm assuming this was from the past ("when i was a teenager") when the messages were much more generic and fixed than they are today.