I do think the concern about unforeseen infrastructure costs are warranted, especially if a city doesn't excel in urban planning or has problems with NIMBYism derailing good plans. But I think most of the cities on the shortlist are fair game and could handle a project of this scale.
Housing prices aren't solved by forcing homeowners to subsidize commercial development, either. Ml
Because a bunch of jerks in SV won't let more housing go in?
Agreed.
https://www.axios.com/the-great-stagnation-americans-stopped...
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/business/how-anti-growth-...
But bringing in Amazon is going to necessitate adding housing stock, and that just doesn't happen in like Boston that already have housing issues and rampant NIMBYism.
how did you reach that conclusion?
That's far, far from "most people". Landlords, for instance, would benefit, due to being able to charge higher rents. But everyone else in that town that rents would not benefit. And I dare say there are more renters than there are landlords.
Most people are landlords..