News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub down by rplnt on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:32AM (#16124562)
While I kind of hate Atlassian products (bloated, horrible APIs), and Bitbucket has some serious UX problems (Find), it's still better than have your repos be offline.

There's not much that can go wrong on a single instance with a local database. Have a failover in case the HW fails and you are good to go, and it's faster. The pricing is not great, but perhaps that's something GitLab can solve.

But being hip and being lean (even if it costs more) is more important I guess.

Re:GitHub down by nik736 on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:33AM (#16124574)
Did you actually notice that BitBucket was down yesterday for several hours and still has huge issues?
Re:GitHub down by zbentley on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:38AM (#16124652)
I think GP was referring to the fact that bitbucket.org-the-website is just the Atlassian-hosted installation of BitBucket-the-Atlassian-product, which you can also self-host and self-administrate.

It is payware, but reasonably affordable ($10/10 users, usually).

I've seen companies squeeze some (probably contract-breaching) huge numbers of users out of the very small plans of Atlassian software, as well, usually via insane multiple-people-using-same-account editing conventions.

Re:GitHub down by stephenr on Thursday January 11, 2018 @11:00AM (#16124929)
> to the fact that bitbucket.org-the-website is just the Atlassian-hosted installation of BitBucket-the-Atlassian-product, which you can also self-host and self-administrate.

Nope. They're completely separate things.

The hosted one they bought, and does mercurial too.

The self hosted one is what used to be called stash, and is git only afaik.

Re:GitHub down by ehPReth on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:45AM (#16124752)
GitHub also has an enterprise version analogous (AIUI) to running Bitbucket or GitLab locally: https://enterprise.github.com/home
Re:GitHub down by rplnt on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:55AM (#16124872)
Ah, good point, I forgot about this.
Re:GitHub down by dx034 on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:34AM (#16124591)
Isn't Gitlab at least as hip as Github?
Re:GitHub down by apple4ever on Thursday January 11, 2018 @01:14PM (#16126193)
GitLab is actually better than GitHub, and not just because it can be self hosted.
Re:GitHub down by save_ferris on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:36AM (#16124630)
Not a Bitbucket user, but this surprises me given the seemingly constant downtime issues that plagued Hipchat when I used it on a regular basis, but maybe it was just isolated to that one product.
Re:GitHub down by skeddles on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:36AM (#16124627)
BitBucket was down most of yesterday
Re:GitHub down by zbentley on Thursday January 11, 2018 @10:39AM (#16124673)
See my reply to nik736's comment in this subthread: bitbucket.org is just Atlassian's copy of BitBucket, which you can buy from them and hose yourself.

EDIT: I meant "host", not "hose", but given some of my experience sysadminning Atlassian products, the sentence may still be correct.

Re:GitHub down by knownothing on Thursday January 11, 2018 @11:29AM (#16125169)
> bitbucket.org is just Atlassian's copy of BitBucket, which you can buy from them and hose yourself.

This is incorrect. Bitbucket Cloud and Server are two completely separate codebases. On the other hand, GitHub Enterprise is basically a snapshot of the production GitHub application.

Re:GitHub down by zbentley on Thursday January 11, 2018 @03:18PM (#16127420)
Interesting, thanks for the info. I had assumed BitBucket cloud was a selected distribution of mostly the same components as BitBucket Server, plus a few proprietary things they don't sell in the hosted version.
Re:GitHub down by knownothing on Thursday January 11, 2018 @04:20PM (#16127981)
No problem. Atlassian actually acquired Bitbucket in 2010 and then released Stash (later rebranded as Bitbucket Server) in 2012.