Re:WDMyCloud Multiple Vulnerabilities
by mey on Friday January 05, 2018 @11:52PM
(#16083920)
I'm having modest success using an eSATA enclosure on Windows with Storage Spaces. On the Linux side, BTRFS may be suitable but harder to manage (This is part of what Synology/NetGear are providing management around.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
In my experience btrfs is not suitable for anything.
Unfortunately, I've learned this the hard way. Twice.
I'm sure it's more stable now than it was when I used it last, but it's frustrating when people say "no, this time it's really stable!" and then you lose data due to a bug. This same thing has never happened to me with ZFS on Linux, which is a shame because the licensing issues make it painful for me to use. I like up to date kernels.
I feel like btrfs should be phased out. It was clearly developed in a fashion that did nothing to prevent preventable bugs. This may be the same frustration that's leading RedHat to work on their own competing filesystem...
Any suggestions for a dynamically grow-able/shrinkable system of mixed drives for linux? When I last looked (and why I went with Storage Spaces) was that ZFS requires pools to be fixed at initialization, and I wasn't sure what other OSS solutions were mature at the time.
I have no suggestions honestly, I have looked into it pretty extensively and would like to go ZFS. But it will cost a decent amount for the setup I am looking for. It seems to be "all or nothing"