News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Basecamp doesn’t employ anyone in SF, but now we pay ever... by conanbatt on Tuesday January 02, 2018 @01:35PM (#16054076)
> The last part is only true because most of today's organizations and processes are organized this way. Objectively, there's very little (outside of the individuals ability/willingness to work) that can't be optimized for remote work using modern technology.

Only the most important one: communication.

Its like saying you dont need to meet someone in person before marrying them, because all you need to know can be asked on an email or a skype call..

> I've been working remote for many years now and even many large enterprises I have worked for recently have adopted tools needed for working remotely efficiently (easy video/chat/screen share, collaborative productivity tools etc.). At this point, my impression it's mostly mental barriers (managers!) that stall any progress in this area.

I have been mostly a remote worker and I'm positively confident in-office working is more productive than remote, the same way going to the gym is more effective than working out at your home for the whole. There are exceptions and deviations, but the generality is true. Thats my model, but reality also matches with that idea: othterwise remote companies would be eating in-office companies, but they arent.

Re:Basecamp doesn’t employ anyone in SF, but now we pay ever... by imhoguy on Wednesday January 03, 2018 @01:25PM (#16063548)
I suppose you were working in not remote-first companies. Then indeed water-cooler talks keep remotees behind. But I can't agree on productivity and gym parts.

Massive telecommuting is quite recent habit thanks to technology advancements and it still needs some paradigm shift especially on management level. Such shift had to happen in the past with introduction of computers in offices, on-line shopping, on-line banking, selling insurances etc.