Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by katastic on Monday December 25, 2017 @12:14AM
(#16002777)
OpenCL is slower than CUDA, but it's not the end of the world.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by mangix on Monday December 25, 2017 @01:01AM
(#16002913)
got a reference?
Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by unfamiliar on Monday December 25, 2017 @02:43AM
(#16003183)
That is simply not true.
Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by biafra on Monday December 25, 2017 @02:57AM
(#16003228)
Please be more specific. What is not true? That it is slower or that this is not the end of the world?
Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by katastic on Monday December 25, 2017 @08:30PM
(#16006542)
Wow, people are butthurt. It's a wildly known fact in the industry. A simple google search for benchmarks or a PDF like this would have satisfied them. But they didn't want the truth they wanted to be butthurt.
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1005/1005.2581.pdf
In basically every chart and graph, OpenCL is slower.
OpenCL has a higher level of abstraction, so it's got a higher penalty for it. But, you get cross-platform support. nVidia doesn't optimize for OpenCL either because they don't want you to use it over their own competing framework.
But 'dats cool, keep downvoting, guys. Sources aren't real if you can downvote 'em enough. God, I love Hacker News.
Re:NVIDIA GeForce driver deployment in datacenters is forbid...
by grzm on Monday December 25, 2017 @08:41PM
(#16006566)
Would you kindly raise the level of discourse here? You have useful information, so thanks for sharing it. But please leave the swipes and complaints about downvotes and HN members out of it. It worsens discussion and is against the guidelines. You’ll likely receive downvoted for that, more than anything else.