News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magic Leap One by phyller on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @01:13PM (#15972160)
I don't need a virtual 4K monitor. I can turn my head to see more, just like I do in real life. How close do you have to be to see the pixels in a 4K monitor, and at that point, can you see the entire monitor without looking around?

I want the portability, and then the resolution just has to be good enough. If we could get a virtual 1080p display that would be amazing and good enough. But to your point, the VR display would probably have to be 4K just to be able to properly represent a 1080p virtual display.

Re:Magic Leap One by grogenaut on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @01:16PM (#15972205)
you're not doing the math... this is not meant as a slight but:

how big is your virtual 1080p screen representing? and at what distance. give me those numbers and I can tell you what display tech it needs to be, but it's going to be on the order of 10-20x density. it's all about pixel radians.

Also, 1080 is quite small for reading, macs have retina displays which is nearing print when running anti-aliasing.

And don't think I'm attacking you, I want this too. It's just that I did the math.

Re:Magic Leap One by phyller on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @01:31PM (#15972340)
I guess I'm ok with a virtual screen taking up most of the view. Of course it would be better if it didn't. But I'd still pay for one where I could pretty much only look at one screen at a time, with enough space around the edges to see if there was another screen to look at. And to avoid eye strain I'd need to not have to focus a few inches away.

So if I could focus like it was 6 feet away but it was big enough it took up most of the screen from that distance, and it had a 1080p resolution, that would be good enough. And then I'd buy the upgrades when they came around :) The rough math I was doing in my head was that anything that wasn't 1:1 would need probably 4 pixels for every one virtual pixel. So 4K would about do it.

I pick 1080p because most laptops today still have that resolution, and several laptops that I still use have less resolution than that and are still usable.

Re:Magic Leap One by kayoone on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @03:15PM (#15973357)
a virtual 1080 display that looks like the real thing would be a big gamechanger. Most companies don't buy 4k displays for their employees because 1080p is generally a lot cheaper and also good enough, even for reading. I still have 2 Dell Ultrasharp 1200p IPS displays at home that are 12 years old but reading/writing text on them is totally fine at the normal viewing distance. I'd want 4K mostly for more real estate.
Re:Magic Leap One by grogenaut on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @05:21PM (#15974417)
You can get a 4k tv for like $500 which is several huge res montiors and huge. You could easily sue for that
Re:Magic Leap One by jjeaff on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @10:06PM (#15976075)
I just picked up a samsung 40 inch 4k tv to use as a monitor for $275
Re:Magic Leap One by grogenaut on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @11:25PM (#15976429)
Sick. What model. How is it?
Re:Magic Leap One by srcmap on Wednesday December 20, 2017 @02:38PM (#15972956)
Just got a $399 50" Samsung TV on BlackFriday. Base on the review, it supports 4:4:4 which is a must as PC monitor. Hook up the one yrs old cheap HP laptop to it via HDMI port.

Looks great! 4k video streaming from Youtube works very good.

4 x 1080 Tiled windows - perfect for productivities.

I don't do gaming. The latency is less of an issue for me.

Re:Magic Leap One by mnzaki on Thursday December 21, 2017 @07:34AM (#15978347)
Now imagine that in your bag, and can be instantly set up in front of you anywhere in VR.