Re:Ed Lee, 65, SF mayor who had a close relationship with th...
by melling on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @05:44PM
(#15910181)
Yeah, as I already explained twice why the life expectancy at birth in 1950, would not apply. That number includes a lot of premature deaths that no longer apply.
Ideally, you’d apply a conditional probability.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/768215/conditional-...
If you go to the Social Security site, for example, you can calculate your life expectancy.
https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/longevity.cgi
For a male born on Dec 1, 1952, your current life expectancy is 84 years old.
Implicitly, all the people in this thread—including you—pointing to the current US male life expectancy at birth.
I just say that if you are going to use life expectancy at birth, at least use one applicable to the birth of the person in question.