Re:Ed Lee, 65, SF mayor who had a close relationship with th...
by dragonwriter on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @05:14PM
(#15909993)
> Who said you should use this as a gauge?
Implicitly, all the people in this thread—including you—pointing to the current US male life expectancy at birth.
I just say that if you are going to use life expectancy at birth, at least use one applicable to the birth of the person in question.
Re:Ed Lee, 65, SF mayor who had a close relationship with th...
by melling on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @05:44PM
(#15910181)
Yeah, as I already explained twice why the life expectancy at birth in 1950, would not apply. That number includes a lot of premature deaths that no longer apply.
Ideally, you’d apply a conditional probability.
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/768215/conditional-...
If you go to the Social Security site, for example, you can calculate your life expectancy.
https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/longevity.cgi
For a male born on Dec 1, 1952, your current life expectancy is 84 years old.
Who said you should use this as a gauge? That included lots of coal miners who were dying of black lung, etc.
One value isn't a very good indicator. By state and race varies greatly, for example.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_life_ex...
The current life expectancy of an Asian American in California is 86 years old.