News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by tomc1985 on Monday December 11, 2017 @05:40PM (#15901330)
Watching the world drift further and further towards moral prudery is so disheartening, especially when so much social progress was made on this front during the 60s and 70s. Society is so cyclical :/
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by lawnchair_larry on Monday December 11, 2017 @08:31PM (#15902380)
I'm not sure where you got the ideal that moral prudery is involved here, but it has nothing to do with that. The people who want "twitch girls" off the site do not have any objections to cam girls. The problem is that they're hijacking a service that was built for and by a specific community.

Twitch has a large number of sex workers who are just using it as a conduit to find "customers" and are not contributing to the community, but detracting from it. There are other sites dedicated to that.

This is especially problematic for female streamers who are community members and get constantly harassed with "tits or gtfo" or worse. They struggle to be taken seriously as gamers due to the cheap antics and "accidental wardrobe malfunctions" employed by the other women on the site, and are punished for it in terms of number of viewers.

Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by sametmax on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @04:55AM (#15904255)
Now as a payback we should start video game streaming on sexy cam websites !
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by tomc1985 on Monday December 11, 2017 @09:21PM (#15902567)
My age group (and younger) seems to be trending towards a more conservative-yet-inclusive set of morals. This new stink about camgirl streamers is just one facet of something wider and more encompassing. Or maybe I'm just pissed that people are growing up and favoring more family-friendly stuff.
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by lawnchair_larry on Monday December 11, 2017 @10:23PM (#15902772)
No, again, it has nothing to do with morals. There are many sites for sex workers, and rest assured that many in the twitch community who would prefer that they not hijack twitch also visit those other sites.
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by tomc1985 on Monday December 11, 2017 @11:54PM (#15903089)
It's sequestered off into "IRL" which is buried amongst other titles of games. Earlier today, among the dozens of front-page feeds of people doing random things there were maybe three, now I see one (and its one of the same people as before). So unless the demographics of streamers have shifted in the past couple of days since this popped up on reddit, it's hard to consider it a takeover?

Reiterating OP, the momentum of this thing looks more like -- whatever it was before -- it is becoming or has become an generalized attack on sex appeal in a realm where AO/R/18+-rated content is still frequently a kiss-of-death, if not something needlessly danced around. I get that some gamers may not want this kind of thing but, c'mon, let people be people. If it's really bothersome then leave the site and maybe management will make a change after enough follow suit. It's already buried in a ghetto of other banners under "Browse" and I didn't see and there doesn't seem to be any other way to get to it besides search.

Also the twitch community should really evaluate it's complaints about outsiders given that it exists in the husk of justin.tv's corpse.

Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by hackinthebochs on Monday December 11, 2017 @06:39PM (#15901819)
Agreed. I feel like I don't recognize liberalism in the kinds of things that people advocate for these days.
Re:Calls for Twitch to police 'sexual streaming' by jhanschoo on Monday December 11, 2017 @07:34PM (#15902128)
I actually don't associate this with liberalism. To me this seems an extension of the "real gamers" phenomenon, where certain gamers think that gaming and streaming should correspond to some good-at-the-game, purely-about-the-game ideal, which the sex appeal streams clearly do not fall into.