News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by bshimmin on Monday December 11, 2017 @12:52PM (#15898738)
"LIQUi|>" is hands-down the worst name for anything I've ever seen. Do they really expect people to write it like that?
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by mdturnerphys on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:04PM (#15898849)
The "|>" is an allusion to the bar and angle brackets used in bra-ket notation [0]. I believe LIQUi|> is targeted more toward academic quantum computing researchers, who are likely to recognize/appreciate the reference.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra%E2%80%93ket_notation

Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by bshimmin on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:19PM (#15899012)
I will be honest and say I didn't get the reference!
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by urgoroger on Monday December 11, 2017 @03:15PM (#15900031)
Don't worry! I study quantum computation, and I didn't notice that the |> was supposed to be a D to form the word LIQUID!
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by zitterbewegung on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:15PM (#15898969)
It looks horrible but on the other hand it will be really easy to google.

Also, it is an injoke for people familiar with quantum mechanics.

Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by IncRnd on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:35PM (#15899140)
> it will be really easy to google

Hopefully :)

Sometimes it gets spelled as LIQπ‘ˆπ‘–ββŒͺ (http://stationq.github.io/Liquid/) which is different from LIQUi|> (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/language-in...), which is different from LIQUID. It all depends on how Google feels about qubits on any given day.

Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by seandougall on Monday December 11, 2017 @08:05PM (#15902259)
But can you spell it all three ways at the same time?
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview by IncRnd on Tuesday December 12, 2017 @01:17PM (#15907963)
The exact answer would take more time than I have, so I'll say maybe.