Re:Quantum Development Kit preview
by bshimmin on Monday December 11, 2017 @12:52PM
(#15898738)
"LIQUi|>" is hands-down the worst name for anything I've ever seen. Do they really expect people to write it like that?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview
by mdturnerphys on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:04PM
(#15898849)
The "|>" is an allusion to the bar and angle brackets used in bra-ket notation [0]. I believe LIQUi|> is targeted more toward academic quantum computing researchers, who are likely to recognize/appreciate the reference.
I will be honest and say I didn't get the reference!
Don't worry! I study quantum computation, and I didn't notice that the |> was supposed to be a D to form the word LIQUID!
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview
by zitterbewegung on Monday December 11, 2017 @01:15PM
(#15898969)
It looks horrible but on the other hand it will be really easy to google.
Also, it is an injoke for people familiar with quantum mechanics.
> it will be really easy to google
Hopefully :)
Sometimes it gets spelled as LIQππββͺ (http://stationq.github.io/Liquid/) which is different from LIQUi|> (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/language-in...), which is different from LIQUID. It all depends on how Google feels about qubits on any given day.
Re:Quantum Development Kit preview
by seandougall on Monday December 11, 2017 @08:05PM
(#15902259)
But can you spell it all three ways at the same time?