Her regretting bad business deal is not relavent here. Again thats the kind of stuff I would've asked her if I was the one interviewing her.
I certainly do. I regretted that long before the sexual harassment complaints.
She regretted doing business with him before knowing he was a sexual predator. It's plain as day, and your misrepresentation of the interview is why you're getting downvoted. You need to learn to present your case more consistently and with quotes that actually expand on it rather than quotes, like here, which present a different case than you intend.Let's be clear: she can regret that he was an asshole to work with and it in no way reflects on his habits as a sex offender.
"Mr. Weinstein’s final, failed round of manipulations shows how he operated for more than three decades: by trying to turn others into instruments or shields for his behavior, according to nearly 200 interviews, internal company records and previously undisclosed emails. Almost everyone had incentives to look the other way or reasons to stay silent. " [1]
Don't you think its media's job to ask tough questions to his business partners? Instead of letting them off the hook with "yea he was an asshole" type of non answers.
1. https://www.msn.com/g00/en-us/movies/news/weinstein%E2%80%99....
Those are two entirely different things and if you want to avoid criticism you would do well to maintain consistency across your posts.