Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Houshalter on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @05:24AM
(#15850942)
Oh, huh my mistake. I was thinking about how PNG compression is entirely based around using the previous pixels to predict the next one. But as far as I know, apng doesn't update the filters to use information from the previous frame. I guess you can use transparent pixels to compress pixels that don't change though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @03:13PM
(#15855342)
Oh, yeah, it definitely resets the compression context between frames. But so does a video format.
No format that I'm aware of supports lossless compression that spans frames. Which leads to a funny situation where some images compress best by custom outputting a .gif or .png with no compression, and then zipping it.
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Houshalter on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:51PM
(#15856363)
As I understand it all video compression uses delta compression between frames. And you mention another issue I forgot, that it can't reuse Huffman codes or any common segments between frames. Since they are independently compressed.
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:01PM
(#15856930)
> As I understand it all video compression uses delta compression between frames.
And so does apng, more or less, via alpha. But that's less important than motion interpolation, which it utterly lacks.