Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Houshalter on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @05:24AM
(#15850942)
Oh, huh my mistake. I was thinking about how PNG compression is entirely based around using the previous pixels to predict the next one. But as far as I know, apng doesn't update the filters to use information from the previous frame. I guess you can use transparent pixels to compress pixels that don't change though.
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @03:13PM
(#15855342)
Oh, yeah, it definitely resets the compression context between frames. But so does a video format.
No format that I'm aware of supports lossless compression that spans frames. Which leads to a funny situation where some images compress best by custom outputting a .gif or .png with no compression, and then zipping it.
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Houshalter on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @04:51PM
(#15856363)
As I understand it all video compression uses delta compression between frames. And you mention another issue I forgot, that it can't reuse Huffman codes or any common segments between frames. Since they are independently compressed.
Re:Evolution of <img>: Gif without the GIF
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday December 05, 2017 @06:01PM
(#15856930)
> As I understand it all video compression uses delta compression between frames.
And so does apng, more or less, via alpha. But that's less important than motion interpolation, which it utterly lacks.
It's still useless when things are moving, but it's no worse than gif.