News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Fnoord on Thursday November 30, 2017 @07:37AM (#15815244)
Anecdotal, I still use a KVM, for a specific use case. My PC has 2 monitors. My 1st monitor is standard usage, but my 2nd monitor is also used by my partner's PC. If she wants to use her computer, she gets the 2nd monitor (and the speakers) but otherwise I got a 2nd monitor to use.

Practically, it saves me from having to use another set of speakers (you would not use 2 sets of speakers at the same time and I usually use headphones) and it also saves me from having to have or use 3 monitors which takes up more space and costs more.

My partner doesn't use her computer a lot. When she does, all the hardware is available for her. I use the 2nd monitor during development, gaming, watching movies, and RDP session.

As per some comments, I don't see how a VM would replace this use-case but I do understand its niche. Still, it saves us space.

Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Nursie on Thursday November 30, 2017 @09:21AM (#15815849)
Don't your monitors have multiple inputs? Mine do and have for some years.

I think both of my current ones have built in (crappy) sound and both HDMI and Display-Port inputs.

Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Fnoord on Friday December 01, 2017 @10:03AM (#15824166)
Fair point, but I had this KVM lying around as I bought this back in ~2007 when I was using a Linux server as 24/7 desktop (including even some Windows apps via WINE) as well whereas I put my Windows desktop off. I was using one keyboard/mouse/speakerset. While I'm not using the keyboard/mouse function anymore, we are using the speaker function.

Also, that feature you mentioned, while it works with some RCs (generally "source" or "input" key), doesn't take into account all the inputs which I am not using. So I need to go through a list of 4 or 5 devices including DVB-C cause yeah my monitor has that support even though I've never used that input. That's annoying.

It gets annoying the more often you gotta switch. For employees of government (like the mentioned example of the Pentagon) that's gonna be more often than not. Any downtime is then a waste because even if its merely 20 seconds back and forth it quickly adds up.

It could even make sense to have KVMs in businesses where they want to keep certain data strictly internal. But as long as companies aren't being punished for data leaks that doesn't have priority. Perhaps we'll eventually see a rise again of KVMs.

Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Nursie on Friday December 01, 2017 @01:04PM (#15825775)
Yeah, got to agree it's far from perfect - I use it for infrequent direct access to the server under my desk, and it does mean messing around with having extra input devices etc.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Jaruzel on Thursday November 30, 2017 @07:55AM (#15815342)
You are not alone in this. For years my Partner and I had separate machines on a KVM. It was only when our Daughter moved out and her desk became free in our study that we no longer needed this setup.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by copperx on Thursday November 30, 2017 @01:44PM (#15818312)
You had a daughter with your business partner? I'm now curious about the story.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by grzm on Thursday November 30, 2017 @01:51PM (#15818387)
Partner can be used in lieu of spouse for an unmarried couple.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by bfhd on Thursday November 30, 2017 @02:18PM (#15818630)
Even for married couples!
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by grzm on Thursday November 30, 2017 @02:42PM (#15818849)
Thanks for the pointer. I wasn't happy with my phrasing. I should have just referenced a dictionary. MW's sense d is what I intended to convey:

> "a person with whom one shares an intimate relationship : one member of a couple"

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/partner

Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Fnoord on Thursday November 30, 2017 @05:09PM (#15820049)
I use that term because its gender neutral and relationship neutral. I find it irrelevant to a discussion whether we are married or not, or a member of the LGBT community or not. However I don't hide my gender or my partner's gender (ie. I use he and she forms due to practical reasons).
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by copperx on Thursday November 30, 2017 @08:27PM (#15821241)
I have always assumed "partner" either means "business partner" or that the person is signaling both (1) "I'm gay" without being overt and (2) "I'm resent society's prevailing idea of marriage." at the same time.

One can use "spouse" or "significant other" to avoid the perception of being passive-aggressive.

Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by grzm on Thursday November 30, 2017 @08:43PM (#15821297)
I'd encourage you to give others the benefit of the doubt. Without other evidence, that "perception of being passive-agressive" is only that, a perception.
Re:The Peculiarly Quiet Decline and Fall of the KVM by Fnoord on Friday December 01, 2017 @06:10AM (#15823166)
Those terms work as well, but the term "partner" translates 1:1 in my native language so I can use the term in my 2 main languages. YMMV.