Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator
by FreeRadical on Monday November 27, 2017 @03:32PM
(#15790963)
What is allowed that horrifies you?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator
by jonmc12 on Monday November 27, 2017 @03:50PM
(#15791206)
Robert Reich's "Saving Capitalism" documentary on Netflix does a pretty good job to answer this question.
TLDR; Wall Street is part of an industrial/political system that extols "free market" capitalism, publicly, when in fact, "free markets" and "free market meritocracy" is a myth, and they know it. Privately, these same people hire lobbyists and otherwise influence the political system to craft regulation & policy around property, monopoly, contracts, bankruptcy, and enforcement. These regulations protect and enhance the benefit of the few.
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator
by emodendroket on Monday November 27, 2017 @04:03PM
(#15791359)
I wouldn't say that's totally wrong... but does it follow that, therefore, there should be no regulation whatsoever? That has negative consequences too.
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator
by sschueller on Monday November 27, 2017 @03:38PM
(#15791035)
One that bothers me the most is automated high frequency trading. They can cause the entire market to crash because of one mistake.
Re:Initial Coin Offerings Horrify a Former S.E.C. Regulator
by kirillseva on Monday November 27, 2017 @03:41PM
(#15791098)
automated high frequency trading also does the important work of eliminating the question "Which exchange should I buy AAPL at?"
HFT is mostly ultra-fast arbitrage programs, and the benefit of using them far outweighs the downsides.
Maybe the problem is not with HFT but in the industry as a whole