Re:The beginning of the end for copper wire
by andymcsherry on Sunday November 26, 2017 @04:48PM
(#15783213)
He certainly wasn't. If you read his political blog (http://electoral-vote.com/), you'll find this sort of sarcasm is his hallmark.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The beginning of the end for copper wire
by cperciva on Sunday November 26, 2017 @05:38PM
(#15783490)
Right, my extreme understatement was my British sense of humour coming through. I was forgetting that HN has people whose only exposure to Tanenbaum is via the Linus-Tanenbaum debate (or possibly not even that) and for whom his sarcasm and my characterization of it would be less obvious.
My favourite Tanenbaumism, while I'm on the topic: Aircraft carriers are modular. If a toilet gets clogged, it doesn't start launching nuclear missiles.
The quote would be so much better if the subject were submarines instead of carriers.
Re:The beginning of the end for copper wire
by cperciva on Sunday November 26, 2017 @08:00PM
(#15784044)
Perhaps... but the non-modular software equivalents of aircraft carriers routinely do launch metaphorical nuclear missiles despite not being intended to ever have that functionality.
Re:The beginning of the end for copper wire
by abysmalfitzg on Sunday November 26, 2017 @10:56PM
(#15784696)
I do agree that aircraft carriers have stronger claims to being British :)