Re:Code Sponsor is shutting down on December 8
by icebraining on Saturday November 25, 2017 @04:24AM
(#15775184)
You mean, legal angle? Probably not, but Github can simply ban all links to Code Sponsor.
Re:Code Sponsor is shutting down on December 8
by pedro596 on Saturday November 25, 2017 @06:39AM
(#15775583)
But why not get Github out of the equation?
I know it might seem a lot to ask but there are alternatives, Github has their right to ban you but it don't need to be the end. Or am I missing something?
Re:Code Sponsor is shutting down on December 8
by TAForObvReasons on Saturday November 25, 2017 @10:01AM
(#15776197)
Author responded in another thread earlier: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15774729
> 60% of all traffic through Code Sponsor came from Github. 15% came from ad blocked traffic (I have no idea the referer). About 15% came from websites and then the remainder came from different repository websites (dockerhub, npm, etc).
From the monetizable repo views, 86% of all views were from Github. Barring a massive cultural shift, Github has to be part of the equation.
Re:Code Sponsor is shutting down on December 8
by cavneb on Saturday November 25, 2017 @10:26AM
(#15776294)
Yes, we are a way for sponsors and developers to connect. We do not tell developers where in their code to place the banner. In hindsight, this may have been part of the problem. Perhaps we should have been more rigid in how we allow developers to present the banner.
TAForObjReasons is exactly right. Github has to be a part of the equation.
If so, I don't think GitHub has an angle to attack you.
A developer with a Commission Junction account could very well put CJ links in their README. That would not give GitHub a vector to attack CJ.