News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by DennisP on Thursday November 23, 2017 @05:59AM (#15764288)
Coinbase uses redundant hardware wallets in geographically-distributed safe deposit boxes for their cold storage. It's very unlikely that they'll have a major theft from that, and their hot wallet funds are insured.

Personally I think hardware wallet random numbers are safe but anyone technical who's worried about that could generate their own from von Neumann coin flips, and turn that into a 24-word seed for setting up a hardware wallet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_coin#Fair_results_from_a_...

I wouldn't say this is more difficult than securing a large amount of gold. If someone gets into your safe deposit they can just take your gold. With a hardware wallet you get three guesses of a 4 to 8 digit PIN and then it wipes itself. And you can't store gold redundantly to protect from loss.

Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by pnutjam on Thursday November 23, 2017 @08:26AM (#15764868)
If I live in a huge city, I might have afew million people to protect your gold against.

Anywhere in the world your securing Bitcoin against a billion or more people, plus bots. A proven attack vector could wipe out thousands of people in afew minutes.

Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by DennisP on Thursday November 23, 2017 @12:08PM (#15766379)
If your key was generated properly and isn't on a computer connected to the internet, the only attack vector is physical.
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by vasco on Thursday November 23, 2017 @06:26AM (#15764379)
> With a hardware wallet you get three guesses of a 4 to 8 digit PIN and then it wipes itself

> wipes itself

Now that seems like a really shitty security feature. Whoever finds it can just wipe out your funds?

Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by josephg on Thursday November 23, 2017 @07:33AM (#15764602)
Its a great feature. I have a ledger nano S. It looks like a big USB key, so it would be really easy to lose. Or it could break or malfunction or get stolen or something. I don't want to risk a significant chunk of my assets on the off chance that happens, so I store the recovery keys in a safe place as a backup.

Now, given that I have recovery keys stored in a safe place anyway, the ledger itself is somewhat disposable. Its still a great way to actually access my money, but if something happens to it I can just get a new ledger. So, yes, I want it to wipe itself if the wrong PIN is entered a few times. That feature means if I lose the ledger I can relax knowing my money is still safe even if somebody finds it.

Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by diggan on Thursday November 23, 2017 @06:54AM (#15764467)
Usually you have a group of "recovery phrases" that once entered into the device, it restores itself so you can still access the funds. There is more information how this works on a Ledger Nano S for example here: https://medium.com/@trionkidnapper/ledger-nano-s-restoring-a...
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by hamilyon2 on Thursday November 23, 2017 @06:53AM (#15764463)
> Now that seems like a really shitty security feature. Whoever finds it can just wipe out your funds?

That is good for someone who have several secure redundant copies.

Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by bonestamp2 on Thursday November 23, 2017 @09:32AM (#15765268)
No, they wipe out that hardware. It's like your smartphone wiping itself with a few wrong password attempts. It can still be recovered, it just means that particular hardware is now useless until it has been recovered. It's great if you lose your smartphone, but if it was just your kid messing around then you can still recover it.
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by hydrox24 on Thursday November 23, 2017 @09:01AM (#15765081)
They can only wipe out your funds if they copy they wipe is the only copy. But this is extremely poor practice, and backups are very common practice to protect against precisely this sort of thing.
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by pjc50 on Thursday November 23, 2017 @06:19AM (#15764355)
How bug-free is the "hardware" wallet though? Especially given that we recently saw a weak key issue force Estonia to re-issue all its PKI ID cards ...
Re:Bitcoin Is More Expensive to Keep Safe Than Gold by DennisP on Thursday November 23, 2017 @07:21AM (#15764553)
To avoid any possibility of weak key issues, flip the coins. Key generation from the random seed uses a standard algorithm that has been public for years, with billions of dollars available for anyone who breaks it. You can check the implementation by entering your seed into other software to make sure it generates the same addresses.