Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by rad_gruchalski on Tuesday November 21, 2017 @07:58PM
(#15753254)
Like Kinder eggs. They should ban them too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by King-Aaron on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @01:58AM
(#15754872)
They're only banned in the US due to a perceived choking hazard (Cue sarcastic "Only in America" comments). I don't see what the association with gambling is?
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by bryanrasmussen on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @09:04AM
(#15756817)
The association with gambling is since you are paying for the egg but don't know what you are getting inside that is a form of gambling (this is implication of argument above, not what I think)
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by dkersten on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @07:21AM
(#15756217)
At least with kinder eggs you know you're getting the chocolate, and you know you will get one of half a dozen toys. But sure, I guess its not that different...
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by lawnchair_larry on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @11:00AM
(#15757761)
They really don't have much in common. If you want more kinder eggs, you have to walk to the store. When the mechanics are based on exploiting a skinner box as they are in games these days, breaking engagement like that pretty much ruins the whole thing. If EA or Caesars Palace required you to go to the store and buy a physical card to play again, revenue would plummet.
Re:Belgium says loot boxes are gambling, wants them banned i...
by barry0079 on Wednesday November 22, 2017 @09:46AM
(#15757103)
Could one argue that adding a small consolation prize to loot boxes overcome the gambling issue with them?
"Here is your item that you paid for, oh also here is a random extra lottery item."