Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by dsr_ on Monday November 20, 2017 @03:48PM
(#15743132)
As long as there is only one Secret region, you can have reliability or you can have classified data, but not both.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by jacquesm on Monday November 20, 2017 @06:33PM
(#15744349)
If your secret region goes down the data just got more secret.
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by degenerate on Monday November 20, 2017 @08:04PM
(#15744747)
Somehow I can see this being an actual argument in government bids, and contracting officers gobbling it up...
Someone posted above that there already was one before and this is the second: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/07/the-d...
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by discodave on Tuesday November 21, 2017 @01:47AM
(#15746154)
First region is top secret. So technically data in the existing region could be moved to the new region, but not vice versa.
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by spullara on Monday November 20, 2017 @03:56PM
(#15743199)
As long as they have multiple zones you can get the reliability ~ huge natural disaster that may affect other regions anyway.
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by samstave on Monday November 20, 2017 @06:33PM
(#15744350)
A region is a cluster of typically three distinct data centers and this could have the three D.C.'s distributed geographically in a model specifically designed to provide both.
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by frandroid on Monday November 20, 2017 @04:53PM
(#15743648)
It doesn't say anywhere that this is a geographically distinct region.
Re:Announcing the New AWS Secret Region
by openasocket on Monday November 20, 2017 @04:56PM
(#15743663)
It would have to have at least physically separate data centers, that's kind of the whole point of having this in the first place.