Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by meric on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:05PM
(#15666508)
The ones who occupy the residences have the votes...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by hkmurakami on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:07PM
(#15666521)
Don't renters also have votes? If so then it's a matter of ratio and willingness to mobilize/fund efforts.
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by kevinburke on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:17PM
(#15666574)
Renters vote but tend to be under-represented on City Councils and such because they are a) younger, b) have less money, c) move more often than people with homes. Renters don't vote as regularly as homeowners.
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by kazinator on Thursday November 09, 2017 @07:25PM
(#15666971)
d) If a place has renters that don't have their own mailbox, it's possible that only the owner will get voter registration mail.
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by hkmurakami on Thursday November 09, 2017 @08:09PM
(#15667170)
Sincere question: is this a bug or a feature?
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by leetcrew on Thursday November 09, 2017 @08:53PM
(#15667347)
feature imo. it doesn't seem inherently wrong that the long term residents should have more say than people who may just be passing through. that said, the degree of difference could still be very inappropriate.
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by acover on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:39PM
(#15666716)
Renters are the minority. 70% of households own their home in Canada.
Re:The end of the housing supply debate (maybe)
by santaclaus on Thursday November 09, 2017 @06:47PM
(#15666756)
Using the San Francisco example from the article, renters are 62.5% of all households [1].
[1] http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/counties/SanFranciscoCounty....