News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An Open Letter to Intel by mcv on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @09:30AM (#15643609)
It's certainly a joking jab at that debate, and while I'm sure he can appreciate the irony of overtaking Linux this way, stroking his own ego is not what this is about. He doesn't need that.

I think the reason he posts this is that, just like everybody else, he's not happy about Intel secretly introducing a massive security hole in their processors. Telling him they were using Minix on such a massive scale would have been polite, but it would also have informed Tanenbaum that Intel was running a secret OS on their processors.

What Intel did was not only foolish and harmful, it was also impolite. Plenty of people are addressing the foolish and harmful parts already, but the impolite part can only really be addressed by AST.

Re:An Open Letter to Intel by ccalvert on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @11:38AM (#15644828)
"stroking his own ego is not what this is about. He doesn't need that."

Forgive me for interjecting politics into this debate, but we all know at this point that there is at least one highly successful egotist in this world who still needs to have his ego stroked on a regular (daily) basis. I admire Tanenbaum and doubt that he fits into this category, but the category does exist.

Re:An Open Letter to Intel by AnkhMorporkian on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @03:04PM (#15647001)
I honestly can't tell if you mean Trump or Torvalds.
Re:An Open Letter to Intel by firethief on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @06:34PM (#15648756)
It has to be Torvalds. They said "highly successful".