News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-orientation (2014). Parent comment

Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or... by macspoofing on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @05:34AM (#15642271)
>MVC is a simple concept. You don’t need a framework to organize your modules.

If you're writing 1000 lines of throwaway code I agree with you. If you're writing a 100,000 lines of code that is meant to be supported for years - then I disagree wholeheartedly.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or... by beaconstudios on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @10:31AM (#15644162)
I think the move away from MVC frameworks and the move towards microservices go hand in hand. MVC frameworks are usually better suited to monolithic apps and that's just not the way things are done at the moment, for better or worse.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Sick of Ruby, dynamic typing, side effects, and object-or... by dfischer on Tuesday November 07, 2017 @03:36PM (#15647319)
Maybe we're not aligned in what I'm trying to communicate. You can create a simple MVC abstraction without a framework. It's just separation of modules and their appropriate concern.
[ Parent | on HN ]