Well, as a thought exercise, imagine that there exist people who apply the "follow the money" standards to military spending, oil cabals, lobbyists, and sugary drink manufacturers but not to green energy companies, abortion providers, unions, etc.
If PP’s goal were to make money from abortions, they’d stop offering contraceptives. The fact that essentially nobody argues for abortion but against contraceptives is an easy proof that essentially nobody favors abortion for monetary reasons.
Besides, the inability to entertain the thought experiment is basically my point. The result of the skeptical deliberation is beside the point.
Everyone is subject to cognitive dissonance and perverse incentives. Money is just a particularly easy to quantify incentive.
It’s true that everyone is subject to these things. That does not mean that facts don’t matter, that every opinion is equally valid, or that every belief is due to them.
Well, sure, but the story wasn't true so what it was or was not about had no bearing on reality.